Javier Tebas, the president of La Liga, commented on Real Madrid‘s clip against Barcelona. This came after Blaugrana President Joan Laporta claimed that Los Blancos were the “regime” team in the current refereeing scandal. “Real Madrid’s video? La Liga is silent about this video. Franco said it didn’t matter what team he supported ,”.
A new scandal erupted this week with the comments made by Joan Laporta during the press conference where he was present for the Negreira case. He fired at Real Madrid. For 70 years, the people responsible for delivering justice on the field have either been former Real Madrid players or partners. The regime team “.
White House responded quickly, publishing a video in its official accounts across different social media platforms. The video targeted the Blaugrana for its alleged ties with dictator Francisco Franco. “I wouldn’t have made the video Real Madrid broadcast. Tebas added that “what Joan Laporta had to say about the regime team was also not helpful.”
“Regarding Laporta’s relationship, I have talked to him, and I try to maintain good relationships, which doesn’t mean they will be favoured or not. “There was always communication with Barcelona. It has been stated that he was the one that should have called clubs to explain the situation, as the infraction is coming from Barcelona. Tebas stated that they would not call him to encourage him.
Javier Tebas claims that Laporta has not clarified anything in his explanation of the Negreira case.
Javier Tebas, LaLiga’s president, insists that Joan Laporta did not clarify anything when she addressed clubs regarding the Negreira case. Laporta addressed Primera Division and Segunda Division Clubs at the Extraordinary General Assembly of La Liga regarding Barca’s investigations. Tebas then said, “The tone is lower when you’re close to someone, mine and his.” These are not fake documents. They are actual documents that Contreras’ son invoiced via him .”
“We submitted it with comments that included names we believed were involved. The document is a coincidence. If it’s proven to be someone else, the document is rendered useless. I don’t believe Barcelona purchased referees. We believe that these payments may have influenced something, but only an intention to do so can be considered criminal conduct .”
He said, “It’s not been clarified.” This topic has not been the subject of a constant discussion. He believes that the message was clear enough, but we do not. He was intervening with Gil Marn. The interventions were repetitive, and nothing else could be added. We cut the video because more people wanted to speak. Real Madrid did not intervene .”